printer friendly version
Linguist claims Indian orgin for 'redskins' term
Monday, October 3, 2005
A Smithsonian Institution linguist claims the term "redskins" was first used by tribal leaders back in the early 1800s and was not meant to be pejorative, The Washington Post reports.
In research published in the European Review of Native American Studies, linguist Ives Goddard said the first appearance of "red skin" was in a news story in 1815 that detailed talks between tribes and the U.S. The newspaper quoted the words of Meskwaki chief Black Thunder.
"Restrain your feelings and hear calmly what I say," Black Thunder reportedly said.... "I have never injured you, and innocence can feel no fear. I turn to all red skins and white skins, and challenge an accusation against me."
Goddard said his research can't be used to justify the current use of the term. Activist Suzan Shown Harjo, the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the Washington "Redskins" team names, says the term has negative origins.
Get the Story:
A Linguist's Alternative History of 'Redskin'
(The Washington Post 10/3)
Username:
indianz@indianz.com, Password:
indianz
William "Lone Star" Dietz Research:
Linda
Waggoner: Reclaiming James One Star (Indian Country Today 2004)
Appeals Court Decision:
Pro-Football,
Inc. v. Harjo (July 15, 2005)
Lower Court Decision:
Pro-Football,
Inc. v. Harjo (September 30, 2003)
Patent and Trademark Office Ruling:
Trademark
Trial and Appeal Board (1999)
Relevant Links:
Redskins -
http://www.redskins.com
Related Stories:
Schwarzenegger vetoes bill banning 'Redskins'
(9/30)
Column: 'Redskins' players
not exactly keen on name (09/19)
Research: 'Redskins' coach faked Indian
heritage (08/30)
Column: How about the
Washington Blackfaces? (08/19)
Opinion:
It's time to bench the 'Redskins' mascot (08/08)
TV stations challenged on use of 'Redskins' name
(7/22)
'Redskins' lawsuit revived by
appeals court (7/18)
Opinion: It's time
for racist mascots to go (07/14)
Seminole Tribe doesn't have problem with
mascots (07/05)
Harjo: Ruling expected
any day on use of R-word (06/17)
Harjo:
NCAA should ban all 'Native' imagery (05/27)
Appeals court enters battle over 'Redskins' names
(4/11)
Letter: Redskins owner should
drop offensive name (11/11)
Column: It's
time for 'Redskins' to go (09/22)
Opinion: Redskins should drop 'offensive' name
(01/07)
Seneca Nation invited lawmakers
to Redskins game (10/13)
Opinion:
Fight against Redskins marks a waste of time (10/07)
NCAI critical of ruling on Redskins trademarks
(10/3)
Judge allows team to keep
Redskins names (10/2)
Court
considers cancellation of Redskins team marks (07/24)
Report: Redskins merchandise worth $5
million (07/24)
Judge to
hold hearing on Redskins mark case (7/21)
Opinion: Take Indians out of
Redskins (12/02)
On
Mascots: 'Redskins' is our n-word (09/16)
White Man: Indians proud of
Redskins (5/30)
Opinion:
Why Redskins must change (3/4)
Redskins get 'new' old look
(2/7)
Redskins uniforms
changed, for now (2/6)
Harjo:
Seeking 'honor' in R-word (2/4)
Opinion: Redskins is for
Indians (1/28)
Letters: More
on Redskins name (1/18)
Redskins name OK if it offends
(1/17)
As If: Replace
Redskins logo (1/15)
Editorial: Redskins honors Native
people (1/14)
Letters:
Debate over Redskins name (1/14)
Redskins name called 'dehumanizing'
(1/10)
Redskins told to
pick new name (1/9)
Letter:
'Redskins' honors Native people (1/9)
Opinion: War over Redskins plate
(1/7)
Redskins name
wanted changed (11/19)
Copyright © 2000-2005 Indianz.Com
